Blog Post
Care Navigation Has a Timing Problem
Most conversations about care navigation ask how to get members to use it more: more logins, more searches, more engagement. Those are reasonable goals, but they all assume the member starts the conversation. A better question might be: when does the navigation need to show up?
·
·
8 min read

A member opens her benefits app and types “knee MRI near me.” Two locations come up: a hospital’s outpatient department and an independent imaging center. She opens both, skims the addresses and hours, and picks the one that’s closer to work. The whole process only takes a few minutes.
What she can’t see is that the choice matters. It’s the same scan, ordered by the same doctor, but what it costs can differ widely depending on where it’s done. Nothing on the screen tells her that.
And the search isn’t where her story began. Before it, there was a symptom, an appointment, a referral with an order for the scan. The need had been taking shape well before it showed up in a search box. For most navigation tools, that part of the story is invisible. The first thing they see is the member’s search.
The assumption built into reactive navigation
Reactive navigation rests on a quiet assumption: that the member knows what to ask. It waits for a search, a call, or a question, and then it responds. For the questions members know to ask, that works well.
But our member searched for a scan, and what came back was a list of locations. Help that waits for a question can only answer what’s being asked, and hers was which location is closer to work.
The window
Between the moment a need becomes visible and the moment a member commits to a provider, there’s a window. While it’s open, there is still a decision to be made. She hasn’t compared locations, hasn’t booked, and hasn’t settled on where the care will happen. Guidance in that window can shape the decision. Guidance after the window closes can only help someone carry out a choice that’s already been made.
The window is easy to miss because members rarely say they’re in it. Few say, “I’m going to need an MRI next month.” The need and the search tend to arrive together, which is why a tool that waits for the search never sees the window at all.
Why it’s easy to miss
A navigation program can look successful on paper and still arrive late. Engagement, adoption, and satisfaction are all measured from the moment a member shows up. A member who searches, finds a provider, and books counts as a success.
What those reports can’t show is whether the decision was already settled when the member arrived or how many members never searched at all because they didn’t know there was anything to search for. Most of the metrics used to evaluate navigation begin at engagement. By the time anything gets measured, the window is already closed.
Why it matters
The stakes aren’t evenly spread. A small group of care categories (including elective surgery, advanced imaging, and infusion therapy) accounts for a disproportionate share of benefits spend, and much of that care can be planned in advance. These are the decisions where there’s usually time to weigh options and where the choice of care setting matters most.
None of this is the member’s fault. She made a reasonable choice with the information in front of her at that moment. The question is whether help and support could have been provided to her earlier.
A different question
Most conversations about care navigation ask how to get members to use it more: more logins, more searches, more engagement. Those are reasonable goals, but they all assume the member starts the conversation.
A better question might be: when does the navigation need to show up? If the need is visible well before the search, the challenge isn’t responding faster; it’s being present before the member has to ask.
Think back to our member with the knee injury. By the time she typed “knee MRI near me,” she had a referral, an order for the scan, and a few minutes to decide. Nothing about her search was careless. What was missing was a conversation that could have happened earlier, while the decision was still open. It might have been as simple as learning that the setting is a choice, with both options side by side before she picked.
That’s the window, and most navigation tools aren’t built to work in it. The gap isn’t effort. A tool that waits for the member to ask will always arrive after the decision. So the question worth asking of any navigation program isn’t how quickly it responds, but how early it starts.

Blog Post
AI, Humans, and the Future of Benefits: A Conversation with HealthJoy's CEO
A candid conversation with Justin Holland, CEO and co-founder of HealthJoy, on what's actually happening with AI in benefits, why humans aren't going anywhere, and what the next five years are going to demand from HR leaders, brokers, and the platforms that serve them.

Blog Post
The Human OS: Why the Best Benefits Technology Still Needs People
The framing we keep coming back to at HealthJoy is this: when AI handles the routine, humans get to do more meaningful work. Not fewer responsibilities, deeper ones.